02-23-2012, 11:40 PM
[quote name='IanCD' timestamp='1330038320' post='16106']
A bit of a pattern seems to have emerged that the high res and, particularly, the high pixel density, on e.g. D7000 is more challenging and some lenses 'struggle' with this...
[/quote]
That's actually internet myth. Any lenses which weren't the greatest in the film era, won't improve with digital, most of the time, even if we get more resolution from those on digital compared to colour negative film (basically because we get more resolution from digital in the first place).
The "problem" with digital really is that we can now pixelpeep to our hearts contents and see the faults we never complained too loudly about. B&W film in principle still has more resolution, if only just.
Kind regards, Wim
A bit of a pattern seems to have emerged that the high res and, particularly, the high pixel density, on e.g. D7000 is more challenging and some lenses 'struggle' with this...
[/quote]
That's actually internet myth. Any lenses which weren't the greatest in the film era, won't improve with digital, most of the time, even if we get more resolution from those on digital compared to colour negative film (basically because we get more resolution from digital in the first place).
The "problem" with digital really is that we can now pixelpeep to our hearts contents and see the faults we never complained too loudly about. B&W film in principle still has more resolution, if only just.
Kind regards, Wim
Gear: Canon EOS R with 3 primes and 2 zooms, 4 EF-R adapters, Canon EOS 5 (analog), 9 Canon EF primes, a lone Canon EF zoom, 2 extenders, 2 converters, tubes; Olympus OM-D 1 Mk II & Pen F with 12 primes, 6 zooms, and 3 Metabones EF-MFT adapters ....
