08-10-2010, 01:39 PM
[quote name='edonir' timestamp='1281440182' post='1624']
(a) Canon 24mm/F1.4
CONs: price, limited wide-open performance
[/quote]
I got news for you... it's [url="http://www.flickr.com/photos/genotypewriter/4698284415"]better than the Nikon 24 1.4[/url] and doesn't have those [url="http://www.flickr.com/photos/digitalrev/4295926790"]ugly fringing issues[/url] the uber-expensive new wide Summiluxes have even after stopping down. So the 24LII is the best of its kind... but why do you care about the 1.4-2.8 performance if you're talking about landscapes?
If I'm big on 35mm FF landscapes I'd much rather go for either the TS-E 24LII or the TS-E 17L... how can you go wrong with either?
If it's a versatile solution that you want, then there's nothing better than the 24LII on Canon or the 24G on Nikon.
GTW
(a) Canon 24mm/F1.4
CONs: price, limited wide-open performance
[/quote]
I got news for you... it's [url="http://www.flickr.com/photos/genotypewriter/4698284415"]better than the Nikon 24 1.4[/url] and doesn't have those [url="http://www.flickr.com/photos/digitalrev/4295926790"]ugly fringing issues[/url] the uber-expensive new wide Summiluxes have even after stopping down. So the 24LII is the best of its kind... but why do you care about the 1.4-2.8 performance if you're talking about landscapes?
If I'm big on 35mm FF landscapes I'd much rather go for either the TS-E 24LII or the TS-E 17L... how can you go wrong with either?
If it's a versatile solution that you want, then there's nothing better than the 24LII on Canon or the 24G on Nikon.
GTW