03-17-2012, 08:03 PM
[quote name='popo' timestamp='1331933362' post='16821']
Ken's writing may be controversial, but he does provide samples. "A picture is worth a thousand words" as the saying goes. The 14-24 may be best in its class, but that doesn't make it the best at a particular application which Zeiss targeted here.
[/quote]
And from the first picture, with the moiré sample, it clearly is not as good as he states. Lateral CA bottom left corner, soft in top left. Terrible light fall-off.
BTW, moiré becomes more of a problem when downsizing a picture, something he thinks works the opposite way.
Kind regards, Wim
Ken's writing may be controversial, but he does provide samples. "A picture is worth a thousand words" as the saying goes. The 14-24 may be best in its class, but that doesn't make it the best at a particular application which Zeiss targeted here.
[/quote]
And from the first picture, with the moiré sample, it clearly is not as good as he states. Lateral CA bottom left corner, soft in top left. Terrible light fall-off.
BTW, moiré becomes more of a problem when downsizing a picture, something he thinks works the opposite way.
Kind regards, Wim
Gear: Canon EOS R with 3 primes and 2 zooms, 4 EF-R adapters, Canon EOS 5 (analog), 9 Canon EF primes, a lone Canon EF zoom, 2 extenders, 2 converters, tubes; Olympus OM-D 1 Mk II & Pen F with 12 primes, 6 zooms, and 3 Metabones EF-MFT adapters ....
