03-28-2012, 08:09 AM
[quote name='Frank' timestamp='1332899947' post='17114']
Lenstip has reviews of the Nikkor AF-D 80-200mm f2.8 and the Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 and comparison of them. If I am right the tests were done on D3x. Both are comparably good, and the Nikkor is slightly better.
[/quote]
You are wrong <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
The Nikon 80-200mm D was tested in 2006, and there certainly was no D3x in 2006. The lens was tested on a D200 APS-C. The Sigma is new, and has been tested on a full frame. So, you can not compare them with the lenstip tests.
Lenstip has reviews of the Nikkor AF-D 80-200mm f2.8 and the Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 and comparison of them. If I am right the tests were done on D3x. Both are comparably good, and the Nikkor is slightly better.
[/quote]
You are wrong <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
The Nikon 80-200mm D was tested in 2006, and there certainly was no D3x in 2006. The lens was tested on a D200 APS-C. The Sigma is new, and has been tested on a full frame. So, you can not compare them with the lenstip tests.