03-31-2012, 07:53 PM
[quote name='joachim' timestamp='[url="tel:1333214336"]1333214336[/url]' post='17233']
Hi Klaus,
Thanks. I had to laugh when reading your answer. I feel as clued as before.
Just for an idea or another laugh: Would/could the difference in MTF between best boarder (what you publish now) and the boarder reading when the centre is best be a measure to indicate the quality of field flatness? I assume that could be reasonably easy derived from the data you take. Still the centring issues would remain ...
As I said: Thanks for replying and the above is an idea not a request.
Best wishes
Joachim
[/quote]
Actually I did that in the Samsung 16mm review. :-)
Hi Klaus,
Thanks. I had to laugh when reading your answer. I feel as clued as before.
Just for an idea or another laugh: Would/could the difference in MTF between best boarder (what you publish now) and the boarder reading when the centre is best be a measure to indicate the quality of field flatness? I assume that could be reasonably easy derived from the data you take. Still the centring issues would remain ...
As I said: Thanks for replying and the above is an idea not a request.
Best wishes
Joachim
[/quote]
Actually I did that in the Samsung 16mm review. :-)