05-21-2012, 09:41 AM
Well Markus,
I liked in-lens IS just fine. Here it's just a joy to see we got somewhere with IBIS, and also because there was no IBIS in video before with all these IS-less lenses (primes...). That being said, IBIS doesn't work with chipless lenses. Hopefully fixed soon?
My impression is that the gap between optimized in-lens IS vs in-body IS is shrinking.
Judging only by a few tests (not a very accurate one I confess) on the 45-200 @ 200mm, the IBIS seems to do a better job ! Not fully representative, for sure.
I liked in-lens IS just fine. Here it's just a joy to see we got somewhere with IBIS, and also because there was no IBIS in video before with all these IS-less lenses (primes...). That being said, IBIS doesn't work with chipless lenses. Hopefully fixed soon?
My impression is that the gap between optimized in-lens IS vs in-body IS is shrinking.
Judging only by a few tests (not a very accurate one I confess) on the 45-200 @ 200mm, the IBIS seems to do a better job ! Not fully representative, for sure.