07-15-2012, 07:40 PM
[quote name='Sotirius' timestamp='1342357362' post='19432']
Thank you Klaus for your feedback. As I haven't owned a 24-70 lens before, I didn't know what to expect. Can you tell me how would the sample I have compare with the one you have tested, or with the 24-70 Canon ver.1? I did read the review, but i really don't know how to compare the results. If it was you would you been happy with this lens, or would you have asked for a replacement? Even with a better replacement if I do get one, would you know how much better it could be? If there wouldn't be a huge difference, I will settle with the one I already have.
[/quote]
Sorry but it is next to impossible to give you an accurate assessment without a formal testing.
As mentioned I'd probably call it a valid sample so the results shouldn't be far off from the lab test.
From f/5.6 onward the difference should be marginal in any case.
Thank you Klaus for your feedback. As I haven't owned a 24-70 lens before, I didn't know what to expect. Can you tell me how would the sample I have compare with the one you have tested, or with the 24-70 Canon ver.1? I did read the review, but i really don't know how to compare the results. If it was you would you been happy with this lens, or would you have asked for a replacement? Even with a better replacement if I do get one, would you know how much better it could be? If there wouldn't be a huge difference, I will settle with the one I already have.
[/quote]
Sorry but it is next to impossible to give you an accurate assessment without a formal testing.
As mentioned I'd probably call it a valid sample so the results shouldn't be far off from the lab test.
From f/5.6 onward the difference should be marginal in any case.