07-23-2012, 08:25 PM
[quote name='nsandersen' timestamp='1343067484' post='19564']
I guess it depends what quality and handling you find acceptable. Weight-wise I changed from
Canon 400D + battery (~556g) + 16-35 MkII (625g) + 60mm macro (335g) + Sigma 100-300 (1440g), total 2.96kg
to
Panasonic G3 + battery (~382g), 12-35 (305g), 45 macro (225g), 100-300 (520g), total 1.43kg.
[/quote]
Thats a quiet silly collection of lenses you picked there, to jack the weight up for the Canon set <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />.
I guess you could have also chosen a lighter standard zoom and tele zoom and end up one kilo lighter <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
I guess it depends what quality and handling you find acceptable. Weight-wise I changed from
Canon 400D + battery (~556g) + 16-35 MkII (625g) + 60mm macro (335g) + Sigma 100-300 (1440g), total 2.96kg
to
Panasonic G3 + battery (~382g), 12-35 (305g), 45 macro (225g), 100-300 (520g), total 1.43kg.
[/quote]
Thats a quiet silly collection of lenses you picked there, to jack the weight up for the Canon set <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />.
I guess you could have also chosen a lighter standard zoom and tele zoom and end up one kilo lighter <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />