[Guest]

I already acknowledge that different groups have different needs. Remember just because a group is not your group does not mean it is less real.



btw the 600 was a typo for 700; though i fully admit they are closer to 800.



http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/892349-REG/Canon_8035b002_EOS_6D_Digital_Camera.html



http://www.dpreview.com/news/2012/09/13/Nikon-D600-24MP-Full-frame-DSLR-with-39-point-af-and-uncompressed-1080p-video#specs



[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1351802555' post='20780']

Neither canon nor Nikon announced 600g FF packages. No "EVIL" is FF anyway (except the Leica).

EVF's will always have downsides, some really rather value OVF's (like me). That is only possible with a mirror.



Large is not a plus on its own, usually. But a better grip, bigger controls and a bit beefier camera when working with serious tele/large aperture lenses have their real benefits.



Like I wrote, compact "mirrorless" makes sense with a few, relatively short focal length lenses. Only for a relatively small group of people they will be interesting. Many others will have different needs that you, and FF DSLRs have no reason to go mirrorless. "Mirrorless" will not take over the FF market (OVF's, fast AF tracking, large telelenses and such do have benefits for real photographers).



Different groups will have different wishes, and use different tools.

[/quote]