11-06-2012, 08:22 AM
(This post was last modified: 11-06-2012, 08:25 AM by Brightcolours.)
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1352187259' post='20832']
Hmmh, the MTFs for the 24-70/4L look rather disappointing.
[/quote]
The MTF's look ok, I think, especially for 70mm... The 24mm MTF is the kinda disappointing one. Looks better than the 24mm-105mm f4 L USM, worse than the 24-70mm f2.8 L USM II.
Compared to the Nikon, the MTF looks not bad again.
It is just the introduction price of the lens that is too steep, though. The weather sealing, constant "aperture", hybrid IS from the 100mm f2.8 L IS USM macro do drive its price up of course. Oh well...
Canon f4:
Canon f2.8 II:
Canon 24-105mm f4:
Nikon 24-85mm f3.5-4.5 VR:
Hmmh, the MTFs for the 24-70/4L look rather disappointing.
[/quote]
The MTF's look ok, I think, especially for 70mm... The 24mm MTF is the kinda disappointing one. Looks better than the 24mm-105mm f4 L USM, worse than the 24-70mm f2.8 L USM II.
Compared to the Nikon, the MTF looks not bad again.
It is just the introduction price of the lens that is too steep, though. The weather sealing, constant "aperture", hybrid IS from the 100mm f2.8 L IS USM macro do drive its price up of course. Oh well...
Canon f4:
Canon f2.8 II:
Canon 24-105mm f4:
Nikon 24-85mm f3.5-4.5 VR: