11-25-2012, 01:42 PM
(This post was last modified: 11-25-2012, 02:10 PM by Brightcolours.)
[quote name='Bare' timestamp='1353840691' post='21068']
Always same from you. There is no Sigma or Nikkor lens good as Canon. It's disgusting to see that moderators tolerate your Canon fanboyism through many forums.
[/quote]
Hello Nikon fanboy. I am pointing out the obvious about this lens, that your fanboyism can not see that is not my problem.
Funny thing is that I often say nice things about nice lenses, also from Nikon (for instance the lovely 50mm f1.8 AF-S, the also lovely 40mm f2.8 DX Micro, even my 55mm f3.5 micro and 55mm f2 ultra micro Nikkors) and Sigma (I can't even count how often I have adviced people to have a look at the 150mm f2.8 macro, the Sigma 18-50mm f2.8 EX DC and 17-50mm f2.8 EX DC OS HSM, the 70mm f2.8 macro, the 100-300mm f4, the 8-16mm DC, 30mm f1.4 CD HSM and so on. I even often advice to take a look at certain Tamron and Tokina lenses).
Your allegations are ridiculous... I have been very enthusiastic about the new Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f4 VR even, just a few weeks ago or so. You are the one with an objectivity problem, not me.
And likewise I have been attacked to being a troll many times for explaining my dislike for the Canon EF-S 17-85mm IS USM, calling the bokeh of the Canon 55-250mm not great, and not totally being blown away by the bokeh character of the 135mm f2, for instance.
It is always the same with you, attacking, flaming me when I say something you do not like (even though the evidence of the not so lovely bokeh is right there in the links and images I provided). Sad.
Always same from you. There is no Sigma or Nikkor lens good as Canon. It's disgusting to see that moderators tolerate your Canon fanboyism through many forums.
[/quote]
Hello Nikon fanboy. I am pointing out the obvious about this lens, that your fanboyism can not see that is not my problem.
Funny thing is that I often say nice things about nice lenses, also from Nikon (for instance the lovely 50mm f1.8 AF-S, the also lovely 40mm f2.8 DX Micro, even my 55mm f3.5 micro and 55mm f2 ultra micro Nikkors) and Sigma (I can't even count how often I have adviced people to have a look at the 150mm f2.8 macro, the Sigma 18-50mm f2.8 EX DC and 17-50mm f2.8 EX DC OS HSM, the 70mm f2.8 macro, the 100-300mm f4, the 8-16mm DC, 30mm f1.4 CD HSM and so on. I even often advice to take a look at certain Tamron and Tokina lenses).
Your allegations are ridiculous... I have been very enthusiastic about the new Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f4 VR even, just a few weeks ago or so. You are the one with an objectivity problem, not me.
And likewise I have been attacked to being a troll many times for explaining my dislike for the Canon EF-S 17-85mm IS USM, calling the bokeh of the Canon 55-250mm not great, and not totally being blown away by the bokeh character of the 135mm f2, for instance.
It is always the same with you, attacking, flaming me when I say something you do not like (even though the evidence of the not so lovely bokeh is right there in the links and images I provided). Sad.