04-10-2013, 09:20 PM
Thank you very much Markus,
your answer really helps me!
I completely understand the reasons for price difference (build quality, close focusing, etc), but to be honest, didn't expect that cheap 70-300 are actually optically that good. Of course 70-200 is better - but I thought that 70-300s would be much worse (as in DxO charts) which gladly it is not the case (based on your review in which I believe much more then in DxOs
)
I will let you know what I got and how happy I am with my decision
Thank you so much once again!
yours truly
Bojan
your answer really helps me!
I completely understand the reasons for price difference (build quality, close focusing, etc), but to be honest, didn't expect that cheap 70-300 are actually optically that good. Of course 70-200 is better - but I thought that 70-300s would be much worse (as in DxO charts) which gladly it is not the case (based on your review in which I believe much more then in DxOs
)I will let you know what I got and how happy I am with my decision
Thank you so much once again!
yours truly
Bojan