• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Forums > Back > Thom Hogan's mirrorless This is most likely spam content
Klaus
Super Moderator
******
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 8,103

Reputation: 49
#14
05-05-2013, 11:48 PM (This post was last modified: 05-05-2013, 11:49 PM by Klaus.)
Quote:Digital has not caught up with Ektachrome in every aspect - still Ektachrome isn't any longer. 6x6 slides from a 1956 Rolleicord are a show.


I honestly think most people buying a DSLR kit would be better off with an mFT. Fast moving subjects is the area still justifying an SLR - and perhaps enlargements that can't be handled with 16MP. But how many cheap EOS do qualify here? Then all these bulky Nikons and EOS do not even feature IBS - which takes a lot of the potential low light edge. As I said my opinion.


Based on that opinion I am surprised that mFT sales do not outnumber DSLR sales. Obviously many don't share my opinion.


Thanks for contributing - I mean it.
 

Big is often beautiful because it stands for 'more' (although this isn't true anymore in this market).

 

I agree with your assessment otherwise.

  Reply


Messages In This Thread
Thom Hogan's mirrorless This is most likely spam content - by HarryLally - 05-03-2013, 03:54 PM
Thom Hogan's mirrorless This is most likely spam content - by Klaus - 05-05-2013, 11:48 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 7 Guest(s)