08-31-2010, 09:04 PM
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1283094469' post='2308']
Pretty impressive it seems ...
[url="http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/review/lens_review/20100830_389903.html"]http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/review/lens_review/20100830_389903.html[/url]
[/quote]
Yes, pretty impressive and great news is price in Japan, ebout 2x times than Nikkor 14-24 F2,8 or Canon 16-35 F2,8 II.
[quote name='sloma_p' timestamp='1283204938' post='2352']
Not a bad bokeh for a WA zoom <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> And CAs seem to be a bit better controlled than in my 12-24/4.
[/quote]
100% it has less CA than any other Tokina lens, it's because same glass which can be found in new Sigmas, FLD glass.
Pretty impressive it seems ...
[url="http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/review/lens_review/20100830_389903.html"]http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/review/lens_review/20100830_389903.html[/url]
[/quote]
Yes, pretty impressive and great news is price in Japan, ebout 2x times than Nikkor 14-24 F2,8 or Canon 16-35 F2,8 II.
[quote name='sloma_p' timestamp='1283204938' post='2352']
Not a bad bokeh for a WA zoom <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> And CAs seem to be a bit better controlled than in my 12-24/4.[/quote]
100% it has less CA than any other Tokina lens, it's because same glass which can be found in new Sigmas, FLD glass.