[Rover]

Understood. But I was thinking of it, and I think that both in Nikon and Canon scope the resolutions are sufficient or even superfluous. A lot of people are using Nikon FX cameras with less resolution like D3s and D4, and 24 MP was oddball only until D600 came along. In Canon scope, there is no big megapixel camera - they're all between 18 and 22 MP. APS-C scope is more difficult but I have a couple of points on this one: first, most of us probably use FF so don't care a whole lot about APS-C reviews, and second, two testing lines (8/10 and 15/16 MP) are probably enough for the time to come. Switching often may lead to further confusion and total loss of comparability like with SLRGear.com - they have been testing lenses with various bodies and one has to bear that in mind all the time.