10-17-2013, 08:25 AM
(This post was last modified: 10-17-2013, 08:34 AM by Brightcolours.)
Wow, it does have nice bokeh though. So they do know how to do that. It seems nicer in this respect than the Canon 50mm f1.2 L USM.
But why this lens is even more expensive, is not entirely clear to me when I look at the amount of glass in comparison:
Nikkor 58mm f1.4:
![[Image: pic_004.jpg]](http://imaging.nikon.com/lineup/lens/singlefocal/normal/af-s_nikkor58mmf_14g/img/pic_004.jpg)
Canon 50mm f1.2:
![[Image: lens-construction.png]](http://cweb.canon.jp/ef/lineup/standard/ef50-f12l/img/spec/lens-construction.png)
(The Canon weighs 590 grams, the Nikkor 385 grams)
But why this lens is even more expensive, is not entirely clear to me when I look at the amount of glass in comparison:
Nikkor 58mm f1.4:
![[Image: pic_004.jpg]](http://imaging.nikon.com/lineup/lens/singlefocal/normal/af-s_nikkor58mmf_14g/img/pic_004.jpg)
Canon 50mm f1.2:
![[Image: lens-construction.png]](http://cweb.canon.jp/ef/lineup/standard/ef50-f12l/img/spec/lens-construction.png)
(The Canon weighs 590 grams, the Nikkor 385 grams)