• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Forums > Back > about Fujinon XC 16-50 review, is it a defected sample?
eio
Unregistered
 
#1
11-05-2013, 10:49 AM
I've played with XC 16-50 and XF 18-55, and found that the XC to be sharper than XF in the corner, even in the same aperture settings.

 

my XC's corner sharpness isn't that much worse than its center sharpness, in all focal range, which is quite contrary to the test result of photozone.

BTW, my XF's corner sharpness is quite consistent with review: worse in tele, better in wide.

 

is the reviewed XC sample a bad one?

  Reply


Messages In This Thread
about Fujinon XC 16-50 review, is it a defected sample? - by eio - 11-05-2013, 10:49 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)