• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Forums > Back > Why does the verdict praise the L lens and condem the EF-S lens?
#6
You are right, I have no doubt that the 17-40L is much much much better than a 17-85 IS!

(now)

 

But why do you all here stress vignetting, CAs and distortion that much? It is crystal clear being on the better site to take a good picture against having a poor one where software must help.

 

But vignetting and distortion (and with restrictions CAs as well) are issues where software can help pretty much.

I know the issues around my old lenses and correct them...

 

Okay perhaps I will see the difference when I took some pictures with the new lens and then I understand why my current are some poor undesirable looser lens are. :-)

 

I hope (but honestly I don´t think so).

 

Do you strongly disagree on my thoughts regarding software correction of optical issues (except sharpness)?

cu!

 

Martin

  Reply


Messages In This Thread
Why does the verdict praise the L lens and condem the EF-S lens? - by martin_aus_duesseldorf - 11-14-2013, 10:57 AM
Why does the verdict praise the L lens and condem the EF-S lens? - by martin_aus_duesseldorf - 11-14-2013, 12:55 PM
Why does the verdict praise the L lens and condem the EF-S lens? - by martin_aus_duesseldorf - 11-14-2013, 01:49 PM
Why does the verdict praise the L lens and condem the EF-S lens? - by martin_aus_duesseldorf - 11-14-2013, 04:06 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)