09-06-2010, 07:47 PM
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1283796715' post='2545']
You could also just take a LOOK at my photography to understand that for me (and other photographers) it actually IS an issue.
[/quote]
As said 70-200 VRII completelly fill it's designation as tele lens, if you need a macro lens than buy it.
[quote name='wim' timestamp='1283800177' post='2547']
I think you may be a bit harsh here. I also think that isn't true either, considering, f.e., the comments in the thread started by vieux loup about getting a new dslr.
[/quote]
I'm not harsh with brightcolurs, he is bashing almost every Nikon lens on every forum and not just here on photozone.
[quote name='wim' timestamp='1283800177' post='2547']
An F/2? Is that a typo or for real? If so, thumbs up to them!
[/quote]
Yes, it's typo. In any case I expect it to be cheaper than Sigma.
You could also just take a LOOK at my photography to understand that for me (and other photographers) it actually IS an issue.
[/quote]
As said 70-200 VRII completelly fill it's designation as tele lens, if you need a macro lens than buy it.
[quote name='wim' timestamp='1283800177' post='2547']
I think you may be a bit harsh here. I also think that isn't true either, considering, f.e., the comments in the thread started by vieux loup about getting a new dslr.
[/quote]
I'm not harsh with brightcolurs, he is bashing almost every Nikon lens on every forum and not just here on photozone.
[quote name='wim' timestamp='1283800177' post='2547']
An F/2? Is that a typo or for real? If so, thumbs up to them!
[/quote]
Yes, it's typo. In any case I expect it to be cheaper than Sigma.