12-31-2013, 04:13 AM
Sony's strategy has always been affordable bodies, stupid pricing on lenses.
For example, their 70-300 costs $900 and is only comparable in quality to the $500 area offerings and not remotely in the same class as the 70-300L...
Their 50/1.4 is better than the competition, but not much better than the 50L and is slightly slower.
Their 70-200 is $3,000 and can't compete with canon's, which can be had for $1,800 new right now...
For example, their 70-300 costs $900 and is only comparable in quality to the $500 area offerings and not remotely in the same class as the 70-300L...
Their 50/1.4 is better than the competition, but not much better than the 50L and is slightly slower.
Their 70-200 is $3,000 and can't compete with canon's, which can be had for $1,800 new right now...