02-12-2014, 10:42 PM
I'm really not sure if portraits do have to be sharp like a razorblade. I like that picture. But I don't consider it sharp. The eyelashes are less clear than I expect them.
It's a 16MP camera.
At 36 MP things look different in terms of sharpness, although not better. But the colors and the bokeh are superb, "smooth", like you said, arv. For half the price I'd be tempted. I got sharper pictures at 6400 ISO with D800 and the Sigma or the 85/1.4G but none of that has them creaminess.
Good thing is, I don't need a 50 or 58 right now and I can wait. Maybe after photokina the Sigma will become available.
It's a 16MP camera.
At 36 MP things look different in terms of sharpness, although not better. But the colors and the bokeh are superb, "smooth", like you said, arv. For half the price I'd be tempted. I got sharper pictures at 6400 ISO with D800 and the Sigma or the 85/1.4G but none of that has them creaminess.
Good thing is, I don't need a 50 or 58 right now and I can wait. Maybe after photokina the Sigma will become available.