09-12-2010, 02:06 PM
Hi,
I think about trying this and wonder which way to go. Should I get a converted P&S or a converted EF-S? My current gear is 7D, 10-22, 17-55 IS, 60/2.8, 100/2.8 IS, 135/2, 300/4 IS and 55-250 IS (the 24/3.5 II will likely join them in the near future). My IR knowledge is fairly limited and all I know is that if I get an EF-S it will have LV. I also read that some lenses are susceptible to hot spots and wonder if the 10-22 and 17-55 IS also suffer from this. If so, I might get an EF-S but if not, which P&S would fit? I want one with a minimum of 28mm FoV but 24mm FoV (are there wider PoV in P&S?) will be much better. Last, I know I do not want an IR filter because I mostly shoot handheld.
Budget: I do not have a definitive one but I know it won't make a significant percentage of my shooting so I don't want to spend too much.
Thoughts and ideas will be welcomed. TIA.
I think about trying this and wonder which way to go. Should I get a converted P&S or a converted EF-S? My current gear is 7D, 10-22, 17-55 IS, 60/2.8, 100/2.8 IS, 135/2, 300/4 IS and 55-250 IS (the 24/3.5 II will likely join them in the near future). My IR knowledge is fairly limited and all I know is that if I get an EF-S it will have LV. I also read that some lenses are susceptible to hot spots and wonder if the 10-22 and 17-55 IS also suffer from this. If so, I might get an EF-S but if not, which P&S would fit? I want one with a minimum of 28mm FoV but 24mm FoV (are there wider PoV in P&S?) will be much better. Last, I know I do not want an IR filter because I mostly shoot handheld.
Budget: I do not have a definitive one but I know it won't make a significant percentage of my shooting so I don't want to spend too much.
Thoughts and ideas will be welcomed. TIA.