04-18-2014, 08:21 AM
"quite small" really depends on one's definition. It's not much smaller or lighter than 24-105/4 Art and that's "a brick" just to quote Klaus. And it's much bigger than the 35/1.4 - but the latter is lightweight and small compared to it's genuine competitors. If Sigma continues the "bigger and heavier" way I'll have to look for some wheels under a 85/1.4 :wacko:
I'd use "quite small" for one of the usual 50/1.4 standard lenses. Haven't seen much of night shots yet and some sample shots were made in dull light with no big contrast demands and also only average light quality. I'm looking forward to it and hope it will be here soon. Best sample shots for me will be my own
I want to see how it handles the crystal clear and sometimes very pastel tones we have here.
Also I'm curious which lens it pretends to be for the AF microadjustments. Hopefully the one I already sold.
I'd use "quite small" for one of the usual 50/1.4 standard lenses. Haven't seen much of night shots yet and some sample shots were made in dull light with no big contrast demands and also only average light quality. I'm looking forward to it and hope it will be here soon. Best sample shots for me will be my own
I want to see how it handles the crystal clear and sometimes very pastel tones we have here.Also I'm curious which lens it pretends to be for the AF microadjustments. Hopefully the one I already sold.