06-08-2014, 03:09 PM
The argument that you compare what's important to you, and ignore the rest, comes with the fundamental problem different people have different needs
I don't even think that the biggest threat to MFT is the technology, but more the financial state of Olympus and Panasonic.
BTW, for 95% of what I do, I don't need shallow depth of field either. I am surprised by what you can get out of a 5.6x crop factor compact superzoom under that condition. Even smaller than MFT, no need to change lenses.
I don't even think that the biggest threat to MFT is the technology, but more the financial state of Olympus and Panasonic.
BTW, for 95% of what I do, I don't need shallow depth of field either. I am surprised by what you can get out of a 5.6x crop factor compact superzoom under that condition. Even smaller than MFT, no need to change lenses.
<a class="bbc_url" href="http://snowporing.deviantart.com/">dA</a> Canon 7D2, 7D, 5D2, 600D, 450D, 300D IR modified, 1D, EF-S 10-18, 15-85, EF 35/2, 85/1.8, 135/2, 70-300L, 100-400L, MP-E65, Zeiss 2/50, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300/2.8, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Olympus E-P1, Panasonic 20/1.7, Sony HX9V, Fuji X100.