06-24-2014, 11:51 AM
I'm not sure it is fair to compare to the otus because that lens is true APO; and one has to ask how much more expensive would this lens be if it were APO. Maybe not that much because the 125f2.5 was also APO and it was very inexpensive.
Having said that we've seen Sigma produce very good lenses now for the last 4? 5? 10? years. The only real negaitve is most of their lenses are main-stream. This might make market sense but still it would be nice to seem them tackle some of the weak spots of the industry.
-
Anyways I think the OTUS has better bokeh and a few other pluses over this lens; but that does not mean that i think it is worth 5x? the price.
Having said that we've seen Sigma produce very good lenses now for the last 4? 5? 10? years. The only real negaitve is most of their lenses are main-stream. This might make market sense but still it would be nice to seem them tackle some of the weak spots of the industry.
-
Anyways I think the OTUS has better bokeh and a few other pluses over this lens; but that does not mean that i think it is worth 5x? the price.