• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Forums > Back > Nikon 18-55 vs Sigma 17-50 2.8
davidmanze
Unregistered
 
#10
06-28-2014, 06:01 AM
  If you are looking for the best bang for buck it's got to be the Tamron 17-50mm F2.8, yes once again if you get a good copy, it's as sharp as they come very usable wide open, stopped down it matches some primes, everywhere it goes it gets good reviews.

Did try a S/H copy of the Sigma 17-50 F.8 HSM but I got a poor copy (forgot to mention it on my misery list) funnily it wasn't especially decentered just wouldn't get sharp at the edges.

  Reply


Messages In This Thread
Nikon 18-55 vs Sigma 17-50 2.8 - by stevesayskanpai - 06-26-2014, 11:19 AM
Nikon 18-55 vs Sigma 17-50 2.8 - by Guest - 06-26-2014, 05:15 PM
Nikon 18-55 vs Sigma 17-50 2.8 - by stevesayskanpai - 06-26-2014, 06:14 PM
Nikon 18-55 vs Sigma 17-50 2.8 - by JJ_SO - 06-26-2014, 06:33 PM
Nikon 18-55 vs Sigma 17-50 2.8 - by stevesayskanpai - 06-26-2014, 07:16 PM
Nikon 18-55 vs Sigma 17-50 2.8 - by JJ_SO - 06-26-2014, 08:37 PM
Nikon 18-55 vs Sigma 17-50 2.8 - by stevesayskanpai - 06-26-2014, 08:51 PM
Nikon 18-55 vs Sigma 17-50 2.8 - by JJ_SO - 06-26-2014, 10:33 PM
Nikon 18-55 vs Sigma 17-50 2.8 - by toni-a - 06-27-2014, 05:40 AM
Nikon 18-55 vs Sigma 17-50 2.8 - by davidmanze - 06-28-2014, 06:01 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)