09-17-2010, 04:24 AM
[quote name='omegaleader' timestamp='1284291909' post='2667']
To be honest we left. But not for Canon. Back when there was active Pentax reviews here, I was here looking at lenses multiple times per week, but once the Pentax reviews stopped we drifted away.
I only say this because I wanted to see what the people here though of the announcements. It's a sad day for this forum.
[/quote]
Since almost all (if not all) the significant Pentax lenses have been reviewed there is not much else that PZ could have done to be more active. Klaus is certainly [url="http://forum.photozone.de/index.php?/topic/349-what-no-olympus-e-5-bashing/page__view__findpost__p__2780"]not anti-Pentax[/url]. Certainly the Canon/Nikon full-frame, μ4/3 and NEX merit the recent resources allocated to them.
The DA-L'esque 35mm f/2.4 lens is a major yawn, that's the reason there has not been much reaction to it.
To be honest we left. But not for Canon. Back when there was active Pentax reviews here, I was here looking at lenses multiple times per week, but once the Pentax reviews stopped we drifted away.
I only say this because I wanted to see what the people here though of the announcements. It's a sad day for this forum.
[/quote]
Since almost all (if not all) the significant Pentax lenses have been reviewed there is not much else that PZ could have done to be more active. Klaus is certainly [url="http://forum.photozone.de/index.php?/topic/349-what-no-olympus-e-5-bashing/page__view__findpost__p__2780"]not anti-Pentax[/url]. Certainly the Canon/Nikon full-frame, μ4/3 and NEX merit the recent resources allocated to them.
The DA-L'esque 35mm f/2.4 lens is a major yawn, that's the reason there has not been much reaction to it.
/Dave
http://dave9t5.zenfolio.com
http://dave9t5.zenfolio.com