• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Forums > Back > Ultra wide angle which format APS-C or full frame ?
#3
I recently got the EF-S 10-18mm and it is fun, reminds me of the Sigma 10-20 I used to have years ago. They're slow lenses anyway. The way I tend to use these is to stop to f/8 or so, and you largely don't have to worry about focus accuracy at that point. Sigma do the 8-16mm too, if you need something even wider without going fisheye.

 

If you went the full frame route, it is easier to gain on effective speed from both the lens and the bigger sensor size. On the budget end there's the 17-40 f/4L I guess. Full frame would also keep the door more open to tilt shift lenses. For sure that isn't a budget option.

<a class="bbc_url" href="http://snowporing.deviantart.com/">dA</a> Canon 7D2, 7D, 5D2, 600D, 450D, 300D IR modified, 1D, EF-S 10-18, 15-85, EF 35/2, 85/1.8, 135/2, 70-300L, 100-400L, MP-E65, Zeiss 2/50, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300/2.8, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Olympus E-P1, Panasonic 20/1.7, Sony HX9V, Fuji X100.
  Reply


Messages In This Thread
Ultra wide angle which format APS-C or full frame ? - by popo - 12-25-2014, 11:16 AM
Ultra wide angle which format APS-C or full frame ? - by Scythels - 12-29-2014, 03:27 AM
Ultra wide angle which format APS-C or full frame ? - by Scythels - 01-02-2015, 12:28 AM
Ultra wide angle which format APS-C or full frame ? - by Scythels - 01-02-2015, 04:12 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 9 Guest(s)