02-27-2015, 06:05 PM
I fully agree if you only shoot around normal, give or take, mirrorless can do it all in ever smaller packages. But that makes up perhaps <5% of my shooting.
My idea of a short lens is 300mm on APS-C. I prefer 400mm, and if I put up with the weight I go to 600mm. Again, this is with higher end lenses not something that merely on paper that can do it. Something mirrorless systems aren't really addressing at all, so they wont get any chance at my money until they do, and do it better than DSLR.
My idea of a short lens is 300mm on APS-C. I prefer 400mm, and if I put up with the weight I go to 600mm. Again, this is with higher end lenses not something that merely on paper that can do it. Something mirrorless systems aren't really addressing at all, so they wont get any chance at my money until they do, and do it better than DSLR.
<a class="bbc_url" href="http://snowporing.deviantart.com/">dA</a> Canon 7D2, 7D, 5D2, 600D, 450D, 300D IR modified, 1D, EF-S 10-18, 15-85, EF 35/2, 85/1.8, 135/2, 70-300L, 100-400L, MP-E65, Zeiss 2/50, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300/2.8, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Olympus E-P1, Panasonic 20/1.7, Sony HX9V, Fuji X100.