03-03-2015, 12:14 PM
I know of very few Canon DSLR shooters with AF problems, just a silly little fact. My photos prove that my camera does perfectly well, even with the pedestrian EF 28-135mm f3.5-5.6 IS USM. Foto Magazin did above mentioned test.
You can disregard all that, and also keep on disliking the brand Canon for all you like too.
I speak out of (happy) experience.
Canon, by the way, tells that lenses need to be calibrated correctly and that MFA is only a stop gap solution, as MFA will not cover every distance and every focal length. So, if you do happen to have a lens that needs AF calibration, get that done. My Canon AF lenses have no problems there.
Funny thing is that I wrote why I would probably choose the same again, and for which reasons. You were the one not accepting that. That is how we got into this argument.
You can disregard all that, and also keep on disliking the brand Canon for all you like too.
I speak out of (happy) experience.
Canon, by the way, tells that lenses need to be calibrated correctly and that MFA is only a stop gap solution, as MFA will not cover every distance and every focal length. So, if you do happen to have a lens that needs AF calibration, get that done. My Canon AF lenses have no problems there.
Funny thing is that I wrote why I would probably choose the same again, and for which reasons. You were the one not accepting that. That is how we got into this argument.