• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Forums > Back > Why are MFT (m43) lenses so slow and so expensive?
Dynszis
Unregistered
 
#3
06-28-2015, 09:24 PM
Quote:35-100mm f1.4 would be  enormous, heavy and so expensive only few people on the planet could afford it...
 

You seem to think that it would have to be heavier than a standard 70-200 f2.8 for a full format DSLR. I think all you need would be an equivalent to the aforementioned lens and something like the metabones speedbooster, only with 2 stops instead of one, integrated into the same lens.

 

I understand that currently there is no such thing a s two-stops speedbooster because the flange distance of DSLR lenses doesn't leave enough room for that, but if it were designed from scratch as one single lens, why not?

  Reply


Messages In This Thread
Why are MFT (m43) lenses so slow and so expensive? - by Dynszis - 06-28-2015, 01:19 PM
Why are MFT (m43) lenses so slow and so expensive? - by Dynszis - 06-28-2015, 09:24 PM
Why are MFT (m43) lenses so slow and so expensive? - by Tord555 - 07-06-2015, 09:53 PM
Why are MFT (m43) lenses so slow and so expensive? - by Tord555 - 07-06-2015, 10:22 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)