• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Forums > Back > Why are MFT (m43) lenses so slow and so expensive?
miro
Unregistered
 
#7
06-29-2015, 09:43 AM
Looking at the positive side, you’ve got extra light.

Firstable your gear got lighter

Secondary you wallet is lighter too.

 

Now serious. As one gear head I still puzzling the mirroless way. I invested in APS-C gear 10 years ago and I’m still happy with it. For cycling and backpacking where weight is considered I still thinks that dSLR is lighter. Extra battery and/or chargers that I need will outhwight the advantage of mft.

Please correct me If I’m wrong.

 

PS.  My wallet got heavier since no-one can convince me to buy new photo gear. Happily I can live somehow with it. I know that I’m not the only one. Just look at the cammera  sales numbers.

  Reply


Messages In This Thread
Why are MFT (m43) lenses so slow and so expensive? - by Dynszis - 06-28-2015, 01:19 PM
Why are MFT (m43) lenses so slow and so expensive? - by Dynszis - 06-28-2015, 09:24 PM
Why are MFT (m43) lenses so slow and so expensive? - by miro - 06-29-2015, 09:43 AM
Why are MFT (m43) lenses so slow and so expensive? - by Tord555 - 07-06-2015, 09:53 PM
Why are MFT (m43) lenses so slow and so expensive? - by Tord555 - 07-06-2015, 10:22 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)