• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Forums > Back > Why are MFT (m43) lenses so slow and so expensive?
thxbb12
All-Star
*****
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,257

Reputation: 18
#17
06-29-2015, 02:44 PM (This post was last modified: 06-29-2015, 02:44 PM by thxbb12.)
Quote:Let me rephrase that:

 

MFT is the best at MFT size/weight/performance/cost. Smile

 

I have looked at possible downsizing, and continue to do so, but for my needs MFT isn't really small enough to make a practical difference. If a DSLR is too big, MFT would still be too big. I have to keep going to the travelzoom compacts to make a worthwhile size difference for my personal needs. I'm not convinced even at bridge camera size.
 

If the 24-70 range is enough for your need, it might be worth looking into a Sony RX100 III? It's really small and pocketable while still providing better IQ (1 inch sensor) than almost any compacts.

--Florent

Flickr gallery
  Website
  Reply


Messages In This Thread
Why are MFT (m43) lenses so slow and so expensive? - by Dynszis - 06-28-2015, 01:19 PM
Why are MFT (m43) lenses so slow and so expensive? - by Dynszis - 06-28-2015, 09:24 PM
Why are MFT (m43) lenses so slow and so expensive? - by thxbb12 - 06-29-2015, 02:44 PM
Why are MFT (m43) lenses so slow and so expensive? - by Tord555 - 07-06-2015, 09:53 PM
Why are MFT (m43) lenses so slow and so expensive? - by Tord555 - 07-06-2015, 10:22 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)