[stoppingdown]

I partially agree with the first part of JoJu's comment - but I say, ok, innovation is not bad per se. I might imagine some cases in which the light field technology could be useful.

 

"Tony Northrop made the remark, that the camera need to be rebooted quite often (in comparison  to other cameras)."

 

I've read some reviews and this actually to me sounds as it's the real problem. If you want to introduce a new technology such as light field, fine, but you should make a camera that's on par with a regular camera for all the other things (usability, reliability, etc...) and then offers that new technique. Otherwise it sounds as you're just trying to sell a prototype. I mean, if we were talking about a tool for engineers, there would be lots of them happy to play with a prototype. But aiming at photographers, they want to be able to take pictures with no hassles.