[Jan S]

Hello, may I question results from your test of canon 35mm f1,4 mark II because it is inconsistent with other tests on internet. When I compare your MTF(resolution) result from canon 35mm f1,4 II on 5DS R and Sigmas 35mm f1,4 on 20 megapixels than sigma outperforms canon on the edges at f1,4 despite that 5DS R have more megapixels and has AA filter cancelation.
 
When I compare this same setup on Dxomark (links below) than sigma has pronouncedly worst corner performance. I know, they use different approach but when I also compare this setup on "the-digital-picture.com" (link below) I can optically see pronouncedly better performance with canons 35mm mark II. The difference can be seen in both comparison of 1Ds mark III R vs 1Ds mark III and 5DS R vs 1Ds mark III. By this I meant no offence, I just want to know that your finding are correct and if they are correct than how should I interpret them or what cause the difference. Thank you.
 
Sincerely Jan.
 
Links:
 
At Dxo I compared sharpness on field map. Measurements -> sharpness -> Field map
 
 
http://www.dxomark.com/Lenses/Compare/Si..._1589_1009
 
http://www.dxomark.com/Lenses/Compare/Si...5_1589_436
 
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Revie...&APIComp=0
 
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Revie...&APIComp=0