09-27-2010, 01:48 PM
[quote name='genotypewriter' timestamp='1285594303' post='3288']
Thanks... in short I'm too lazy to do a test on that <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> Mainly because it serves a very little purpose. The systems here are too different to be compared against each other in a standard way, looking at center and corner crops. We already know the center's better than the corners so what I've shown is like the worst-case scenario.
Also, whether we think the 16 is good or bad, there really isn't any other lens that's comparable in size, focal length and speed-wise. But if portability/AF is not a requirement, then you know the absolute best lenses for IQ out there anyway, right? <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
GTW
[/quote]
Yes, if portability isn't, it's L all the way, if AF isn't, than it's TS-E 17L, TS-24L II, TS-E 45, MP-E 65, TS-E 90 <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />.
Kind regards, Wim <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
Thanks... in short I'm too lazy to do a test on that <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> Mainly because it serves a very little purpose. The systems here are too different to be compared against each other in a standard way, looking at center and corner crops. We already know the center's better than the corners so what I've shown is like the worst-case scenario.Also, whether we think the 16 is good or bad, there really isn't any other lens that's comparable in size, focal length and speed-wise. But if portability/AF is not a requirement, then you know the absolute best lenses for IQ out there anyway, right? <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />GTW
[/quote]
Yes, if portability isn't, it's L all the way, if AF isn't, than it's TS-E 17L, TS-24L II, TS-E 45, MP-E 65, TS-E 90 <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />.Kind regards, Wim <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
Gear: Canon EOS R with 3 primes and 2 zooms, 4 EF-R adapters, Canon EOS 5 (analog), 9 Canon EF primes, a lone Canon EF zoom, 2 extenders, 2 converters, tubes; Olympus OM-D 1 Mk II & Pen F with 12 primes, 6 zooms, and 3 Metabones EF-MFT adapters ....
