12-23-2015, 07:57 PM
To be quite honest I'm very happy with 97% especially on FF, it gives that little margin of error. The first camera I had that had 100% coverage was the Nikon F, I wanted that because I was shooting Kodachrome at the time and the general OVF's had a lot less than that, Nikormat 93%, Pentax Sa1 in the eighties, Zenith was in the 70s. 97% is just about right for the AF-D lenses, you can crop out the extreme corners and get to the sharp meat without losing the composition....APSc I think you want 100% there as you don't want the frame going to waste. Again -3/-2 the problem I find is the exposure not the AF! I've just come back from shooting 250 night time shots in Montpellier mostly at 1600 ISO, the AF didn't even think of "not" locking on, I would have given it a slap if it hadn't......I've yet to look at the shots.....beers first photos later.....well it's Christmas!
OT.
What a great city Montpellier is!..... and what a lovely day!.. 18/19° blue sky and sunny, siiting out drinking a couple of sherbets. Christmas decorations, entertainment, everybody was out, families..... not a hint of aggression, loads of buskers, two virtuoso violinists and a great pianist.... the 23rd of December??
In England the councils have abandoned decorations at Christmas if you want them you have to put them up in the garden yourselves.....in the rain!........... I digress, where was I?
Oh yeah love the D750!
OT.
What a great city Montpellier is!..... and what a lovely day!.. 18/19° blue sky and sunny, siiting out drinking a couple of sherbets. Christmas decorations, entertainment, everybody was out, families..... not a hint of aggression, loads of buskers, two virtuoso violinists and a great pianist.... the 23rd of December??
In England the councils have abandoned decorations at Christmas if you want them you have to put them up in the garden yourselves.....in the rain!........... I digress, where was I?
Oh yeah love the D750!