09-29-2010, 03:51 PM
[quote name='neolam' timestamp='1285772974' post='3364']
bro...between this 3 lens which one is better?? [/quote]
Well ... define "better" <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
The 35/2.8 is cheaper, smaller, has nicer bokeh. That's what counts for me. They are both sharp on the M9 (actually almost any lens I have tried so far is sharp enough for my needs on the M9).
[quote name='neolam' timestamp='1285772974' post='3364']
u said tht V35/1.2 is monster is in terms of size or image quality??
[/quote]
Size. Cannot really comment on its image quality, yet. Got it just recently and since then haven't had any opportunities to seriously use it.
-- Markus
bro...between this 3 lens which one is better?? [/quote]
Well ... define "better" <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />The 35/2.8 is cheaper, smaller, has nicer bokeh. That's what counts for me. They are both sharp on the M9 (actually almost any lens I have tried so far is sharp enough for my needs on the M9).
[quote name='neolam' timestamp='1285772974' post='3364']
u said tht V35/1.2 is monster is in terms of size or image quality??
[/quote]
Size. Cannot really comment on its image quality, yet. Got it just recently and since then haven't had any opportunities to seriously use it.
-- Markus
Editor
opticallimits.com
opticallimits.com