09-30-2010, 01:45 PM
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1285848636' post='3391']
Remember that a 35mm f/2.8 is equivalent to a 53mm f/4 on an APS-C DSLR. This depth-of-field potential is limited here.
Even the 35mm f/2, thus 53mm f/2.8, isn't terribly impressive either but it's be sufficient for basic portraits and such.
So the key question remains what you'd like to do with the lens.
[/quote]
i like to use it in travel, street and some portrait...is it ok with that??
Remember that a 35mm f/2.8 is equivalent to a 53mm f/4 on an APS-C DSLR. This depth-of-field potential is limited here.
Even the 35mm f/2, thus 53mm f/2.8, isn't terribly impressive either but it's be sufficient for basic portraits and such.
So the key question remains what you'd like to do with the lens.
[/quote]
i like to use it in travel, street and some portrait...is it ok with that??