05-09-2016, 03:51 PM
False detail: Detail that is not really there, but appears due to the arbitrary edges of pixels and the subsequent aliasing.
Fake sharpness: Defined edges that are not there in reality, just the effect of the same on/off edges of pixels, aliasing.
That is logically and demonstrably false/fake.
Not showing aliasing is then not fake. You can argue that there is detail that is not shown, sure. But that is ALWAYS the case. The more one would zoom in, there more detail there is to be found. But not an argument against AA-filters.
In audio, there always are AA-filters too. Else you get aliasing. Same thing. It has nothing to do with analogue versus digital either, as your straw man argument seems to suggest....
It appears you still do not understand sampling theory, and how using an AA-filter is not an excuse for anything.
Fake sharpness: Defined edges that are not there in reality, just the effect of the same on/off edges of pixels, aliasing.
That is logically and demonstrably false/fake.
Not showing aliasing is then not fake. You can argue that there is detail that is not shown, sure. But that is ALWAYS the case. The more one would zoom in, there more detail there is to be found. But not an argument against AA-filters.
In audio, there always are AA-filters too. Else you get aliasing. Same thing. It has nothing to do with analogue versus digital either, as your straw man argument seems to suggest....
It appears you still do not understand sampling theory, and how using an AA-filter is not an excuse for anything.