10-06-2010, 12:31 AM
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1286273352' post='3493']
2. That is just plain silly. The silliest point you can have made... sure, blame it on a wrongly focussed non-HR-ed image. Too silly for words. But you can look at the D300 and D700 samples.
[/quote]
In science we don't use words like "silly" to get our points across. It just goes to show that you have little knowledge and exposure you have in the scientific method.
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1286273352' post='3493']
Or any other samples of people who have had their camera converted to AA-filter-less.
[/quote]
To put it in your sort of words... can't you read? I already have an AA-filterless camera and I have used Foveon cameras. You're the one who is speculating everything here without experience anything. Have you used any of these things you're talking so confidently about? No. lol
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1286273352' post='3493']
3. It is NONSENSE what you say. Maxmax uses HR for AA-filterless. High Resolution. Hot Rod visible.
[/quote]
Manners aside, I guess you can't even read... if it's a visible only camera why do they use an ICF filter then as they describe in the first paragraph? lol
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1286273352' post='3493']
I merely have explained that a foveon/sigma sensor appears to resolve more is because they decide to not use an AA-filter. And we can see that clearly, we see (with the D200 without AA-filter) pixel wide lines, sharp aliased lines.
[/quote]
The only thing you explained is your uninformed guess, which is also scientifically unfounded. Demosaicing reduces spatial resolution. Don't you know how that works? Bayer puts 3 points in to 1 coloured pixel, Foveon keeps 3 separate coloured pixels. This is where I stop explaining because the other party is not willing to learn... at least read that dpreview article that was posted recently on the SD1. But I doubt you'd understand the theory.
GTW
2. That is just plain silly. The silliest point you can have made... sure, blame it on a wrongly focussed non-HR-ed image. Too silly for words. But you can look at the D300 and D700 samples.
[/quote]
In science we don't use words like "silly" to get our points across. It just goes to show that you have little knowledge and exposure you have in the scientific method.
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1286273352' post='3493']
Or any other samples of people who have had their camera converted to AA-filter-less.
[/quote]
To put it in your sort of words... can't you read? I already have an AA-filterless camera and I have used Foveon cameras. You're the one who is speculating everything here without experience anything. Have you used any of these things you're talking so confidently about? No. lol
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1286273352' post='3493']
3. It is NONSENSE what you say. Maxmax uses HR for AA-filterless. High Resolution. Hot Rod visible.
[/quote]
Manners aside, I guess you can't even read... if it's a visible only camera why do they use an ICF filter then as they describe in the first paragraph? lol
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1286273352' post='3493']
I merely have explained that a foveon/sigma sensor appears to resolve more is because they decide to not use an AA-filter. And we can see that clearly, we see (with the D200 without AA-filter) pixel wide lines, sharp aliased lines.
[/quote]
The only thing you explained is your uninformed guess, which is also scientifically unfounded. Demosaicing reduces spatial resolution. Don't you know how that works? Bayer puts 3 points in to 1 coloured pixel, Foveon keeps 3 separate coloured pixels. This is where I stop explaining because the other party is not willing to learn... at least read that dpreview article that was posted recently on the SD1. But I doubt you'd understand the theory.
GTW