They shaved off 5mm from the focal length and 0.2 from the aperture number! Did that make the lens 5-7% cheaper? Apparently not... Their pricing is as daft as ever: one could get two copies of the Canon 100/2.8 L IS macro for that price, or almost a whole 85/1.2 L II. I fully expect someone to point out that fact to the world, and I wonder if someone will start blathering about "da unique look" or other supposed merits of this primitive 3 element lens...
|
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Not tired of paying more for less? Trimagon 95mm f2.6 to the rescue. - by Brightcolours - 07-01-2016, 01:29 PM
Not tired of paying more for less? Trimagon 95mm f2.6 to the rescue. - by davidmanze - 07-01-2016, 03:21 PM
Not tired of paying more for less? Trimagon 95mm f2.6 to the rescue. - by Klaus - 07-02-2016, 02:02 AM
Not tired of paying more for less? Trimagon 95mm f2.6 to the rescue. - by Rover - 07-02-2016, 04:31 PM
Not tired of paying more for less? Trimagon 95mm f2.6 to the rescue. - by toni-a - 07-02-2016, 06:50 PM
Not tired of paying more for less? Trimagon 95mm f2.6 to the rescue. - by toni-a - 07-05-2016, 11:59 AM
Not tired of paying more for less? Trimagon 95mm f2.6 to the rescue. - by Rover - 07-06-2016, 01:44 PM
|
Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)