10-17-2010, 09:47 AM
[quote name='Christos' timestamp='1287270718' post='3647']
Klaus you think the K-5 will best out the 7D?
[/quote]
1. "best out" cannot be judged by anybody except by the individual who uses the camera based on his own needs.
2. K-5 cannot take canon lenses, so it doesnt "best out" the 7D of somebody owning a large Canon system
3. any differnces in image quality may or may not exist, but will certainly not matter for real photography, e.g. prints. IF you need a camera solely for 100% on-screen crop- viewing, iq difference may be important. So far I wasnt able to dectect any iq difference in large prints of the more recent aps-c cams (50D, 7D, 550d, 500D, with Nikons D300s being extremly close even with it low res of only 12 mP, full frame is a differnt matter, of course)
4. user interface, lens selection, autofocus and other features determine if the camera suits a buyer. there is no objektive better or worse, just better suited for a particular task and better suited for a photographers handling prefernces.
Klaus you think the K-5 will best out the 7D?
[/quote]
1. "best out" cannot be judged by anybody except by the individual who uses the camera based on his own needs.
2. K-5 cannot take canon lenses, so it doesnt "best out" the 7D of somebody owning a large Canon system
3. any differnces in image quality may or may not exist, but will certainly not matter for real photography, e.g. prints. IF you need a camera solely for 100% on-screen crop- viewing, iq difference may be important. So far I wasnt able to dectect any iq difference in large prints of the more recent aps-c cams (50D, 7D, 550d, 500D, with Nikons D300s being extremly close even with it low res of only 12 mP, full frame is a differnt matter, of course)
4. user interface, lens selection, autofocus and other features determine if the camera suits a buyer. there is no objektive better or worse, just better suited for a particular task and better suited for a photographers handling prefernces.