08-23-2016, 08:40 AM
(This post was last modified: 08-23-2016, 08:53 AM by Brightcolours.)
Quote:Hi Klaus,1) : sizes of lenses only matter for bag space purposes. In that sense it makes no sense to point out the mirror box difference?
Thanks for putting this together!
However, there were a few things that I believe should be mentioned.
1) selected lenses for FF and µFT are for mirrorless while Pentax lenses for APS-C are for DSLR (leave out K-01 which takes DSLR lenses w/o adapter). For telelenses you can argue that this is in favour of DSLR because of the shorter construction of the lens only.
2) as you rightly said, the Pentax DA* 60-250/F4 doesn't really fit but if you replace the Sony FE with Canon/Nikon/Sigma 80/100-400 F4.5-5.6 which is more the range of the Pentax, you quickly end up in the 1340-1750 g range which is more than the Pentax lens even when correcting for slightly faster lens at lower focal lengths.
3) when selecting a more traditional focal length for telezoom (70/80-200) the situation between FF and APS-C also looks different:
Pentax DA* 50-135 F2.8 - 685 g; 136 mm long vs Canon 760 g; 172 mm long
Besides the very informative text, your lens selection goes more in a mirrorless vs dSLR rather than a sensor size comparison.
2) : the Pentax f4 lens is slower of the whole range (f6) in equivalence terms. So its weight advantage compared to a f4.5-5.6 lens would be due to that, making it a wonky comparison too.
Klaus could also have chosen one of the many 70-300mm lenses for FF DSLRs, the choice for the FE lens is fine and not a mirrorless vs DSLR skewed choice.
3) : A Pentax f2.8 lens is slightly slower (f4.2 FF equivalent) and the Canon EF 70-200mm f4 L USM weighs 705 grams. Which goes to show, one can always skew things in whatever favour (do you happen to shoot Pentax?).