09-03-2016, 09:18 AM
Before getting 17-55f2.8 had Sigma 20mm f1.8 on 30D and just loved it (had also the 14 mm but I widely preferred the 20 mm because of recurrent failures of the 14 mm that cost me 500 EUR in repairs over 3 years)
now you made me rethink, maybe I need nothing at the wide end and better invest elsewhere, if I didn't miss the 16-28 in my bag why should I need that 20 mm ?
now you made me rethink, maybe I need nothing at the wide end and better invest elsewhere, if I didn't miss the 16-28 in my bag why should I need that 20 mm ?