10-22-2010, 06:58 AM
[quote name='hackmann' timestamp='1287717602' post='3729']
Thank you for your words.
I am from Brazil, english is not my primary langague.
What I was trying to say is that this lens is cheap if you take into consideration the quality of the image. It have a decent build quality and a very effective VR and cost like 500U$. At 300mm its not good as 200mm or 70mm. At 70mm its a monster.
I dont know anything about those other lens that you told me about. But I am pretty sure you are a reliable source.
<img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
[/quote]
At 200mm it's a fantastic lens but it's f5,6...........I've prefers spent this spend money in a minolta 200 f2,8
Thank you for your words.
I am from Brazil, english is not my primary langague.
What I was trying to say is that this lens is cheap if you take into consideration the quality of the image. It have a decent build quality and a very effective VR and cost like 500U$. At 300mm its not good as 200mm or 70mm. At 70mm its a monster.
I dont know anything about those other lens that you told me about. But I am pretty sure you are a reliable source.
<img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />[/quote]
At 200mm it's a fantastic lens but it's f5,6...........I've prefers spent this spend money in a minolta 200 f2,8