09-25-2016, 03:41 PM
The closer to a squere the aspect ratio gets the easier it is to compose, for me, at least. The 4:3 aspect ratio makes more sense actually for portrait orientation than 3:2. So for studio work "43.8 × 32.9 mm" can be a lot more usefull than a equivalent portion of a FF sensor of 32x24mm for a 4:3 aspect ratio (and a whole stop of difference). For landscape orientation some may prefer wider aspect ratios like 16:9 the difference it will be in favor of FF sensors from a buck for bang perspective.
If someone goes into a total cost of ownership scenarios the results may be suprising, but the Fuji GFX (or Pentax 645Z) seems more sensible to me than Zeiss manual focus uber-lenses for Canon and Nikon FF systems, which are close in price and perfomance.
If someone goes into a total cost of ownership scenarios the results may be suprising, but the Fuji GFX (or Pentax 645Z) seems more sensible to me than Zeiss manual focus uber-lenses for Canon and Nikon FF systems, which are close in price and perfomance.