10-26-2010, 08:31 PM
I just looked up my notes from when I tried Topaz Denoise 4 on 50D camera jpegs, comparing it against Neat Image which is what I use. Denoise did give slightly better output when seriously pixel peeping, but I found the operating speed too painful for my tastes. So I stuck with Neat Image as good enough.
Doh! I noticed they're on version 5 now, so my past impression is out of date. I see on their web page they specifically say version 5 has a "double increase in speed". I guess I need to revisit it...
Doh! I noticed they're on version 5 now, so my past impression is out of date. I see on their web page they specifically say version 5 has a "double increase in speed". I guess I need to revisit it...
<a class="bbc_url" href="http://snowporing.deviantart.com/">dA</a> Canon 7D2, 7D, 5D2, 600D, 450D, 300D IR modified, 1D, EF-S 10-18, 15-85, EF 35/2, 85/1.8, 135/2, 70-300L, 100-400L, MP-E65, Zeiss 2/50, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300/2.8, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Olympus E-P1, Panasonic 20/1.7, Sony HX9V, Fuji X100.