10-26-2010, 10:14 PM
[quote name='PuxaVida' timestamp='1288079248' post='3783']
But I doubt that (not that I pixel peeped and saw differences on screen, yet). But on the D700, the uncomressed option produces ~22-24MB files, while the "lossless compressed" produces ~10-12MB.
[/quote]
So what? There are ways to compress things without loss. Not every compression is lossy. I don't know whether this is the case with Nikon's compression - I'm simply challenging the notion that the fact that compression happens equals loss of information.
But I doubt that (not that I pixel peeped and saw differences on screen, yet). But on the D700, the uncomressed option produces ~22-24MB files, while the "lossless compressed" produces ~10-12MB.
[/quote]
So what? There are ways to compress things without loss. Not every compression is lossy. I don't know whether this is the case with Nikon's compression - I'm simply challenging the notion that the fact that compression happens equals loss of information.