10-27-2010, 12:43 PM
I vote for nikon.
Better construction and you dont have that problem about buying a "bad copy".
Tamron perform better at 300mm. But nikon is very sharp until 200mm. Its hard to beat.
Like i said in another topic, I am giving a very good use to this lens to portrait shots at wide open or in 100~150mm...
VR is very effective.
You can check my topic with some sampes:
http://forum.photozone.de/index.php?/topic/426-af-s-vr-zoom-nikkor-70-300mm-f45-56g-if-ed/
Cheerz!
<img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
Better construction and you dont have that problem about buying a "bad copy".
Tamron perform better at 300mm. But nikon is very sharp until 200mm. Its hard to beat.
Like i said in another topic, I am giving a very good use to this lens to portrait shots at wide open or in 100~150mm...
VR is very effective.
You can check my topic with some sampes:
http://forum.photozone.de/index.php?/topic/426-af-s-vr-zoom-nikkor-70-300mm-f45-56g-if-ed/
Cheerz!
<img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />